Rolling Green Village
Open-data reference.
Rolling Green Village is a for profit - corporation facility in Greenville, SC with 22 certified beds and a 5-star overall CMS rating. The facility has 5 deficiency records on file.
1 Hoke Smith Boulevard, Greenville, SC 29615
Phone: 8649879800
Overall Rating
Health Inspection
Staffing
Quality Measures
Long-Stay Quality
Facility Information
- Provider Number
- 425160
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Provider Type
- Medicare
- Beds
- 22
- Residents
- 16
- In Hospital
- No
- County
- Greenville
- Last Inspection
- May 16, 2025
Staffing Data
- RN Hours
- 2.07 (nat'l avg: 0.68)
- LPN Hours
- 2.74
- CNA Hours
- 2.77
- Total Nursing Hours
- 7.58 (nat'l avg: 3.89)
- PT Hours
- 0.33
- Nursing Turnover
- 51.3%
- RN Turnover
- 40.0%
What the CMS Record Reveals About Rolling Green Village
Rolling Green Village operates 22 certified beds in Greenville, SC with approximately 16 residents currently in care, and carries a CMS overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars. The overall score is a composite of three weighted sub-ratings published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: health inspection results (5★), staffing levels (5★), and quality measures (5★). Because CMS caps the overall score at the health-inspection tier and then adjusts up or down based on staffing and quality, the sub-scores often tell a sharper story than the headline star count alone — a 3-star facility with weak inspection history reads differently from one held back by thin staffing.
The inspection file contains 5 deficiency records from recent surveys, of which 2 reached the actual-harm or immediate-jeopardy threshold on the CMS scope-and-severity grid. No fines or payment denials have been assessed against this provider, suggesting issues — if any — did not rise to the enforcement threshold. Staffing is reported at 7.58 total nursing hours per resident day (national average 3.89), with RN coverage at 2.07 per resident day — the single staffing metric most strongly tied to resident outcomes in peer-reviewed literature.
Classified as "For profit - Corporation" ownership and operating as a "Medicare" provider, Rolling Green Village falls into a category where comparative context matters. National research consistently shows that ownership structure, staffing hours, and turnover are the three operational levers that correlate most strongly with resident outcomes — ratings and fines are lagging indicators of those upstream choices. Reported nursing turnover at this facility is 51.3%, above the level where continuity of care typically begins to suffer. For families evaluating this facility, the CMS record should be read alongside a site visit, direct conversation with current residents and their families, and review of the state health department's most recent inspection report — the star rating is a starting point, not a verdict. All data on this page is sourced from CMS Provider Data and the Nursing Home Compare program; always verify details directly with the facility or your state survey agency before making placement decisions.
Deficiency History (5 most recent)
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Category: Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Corrected: May 6, 2024
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Category: Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Corrected: Mar 16, 2023
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Category: Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Corrected: Mar 16, 2023
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Category: Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Corrected: Aug 12, 2022
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Category: Resident Rights Deficiencies
Corrected: Aug 12, 2022
Quality Measures
| Measure | Type | Score | Used in Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine | Short Stay | 54.9% | No |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication | Short Stay | 0.2% | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine | Short Stay | 75.0% | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with new or worsened bowel or bladder incontinence | Long Stay | N/A | No |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication | Long Stay | N/A | Yes |
Penalty History
No penalties on record.
Nearby Nursing Homes in SC
Achieve Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Anderson, SC
Aiken Rehabilitation and Care Center
Aiken, SC
Anchor Post Acute
Aiken, SC
Angel Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Myrtle Beach, SC
Ashley River Healthcare
Charleston, SC
Bennettsville Health And Rehabilitation Center
Bennettsville, SC
Understanding Nursing Home Data
Related Data from Other Sources
Doctors Nearby
Find physicians and specialists in Greenville, SC on PlainDoctor
Hospitals Nearby
Hospital quality ratings and safety data for Greenville, SC on PlainHospital
Medicare Plans
Compare Medicare plans and coverage options near Greenville, SC on PlainMedicare
County Health Data
Health outcomes, access, and quality metrics for Greenville on PlainHealth
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the overall CMS rating for Rolling Green Village?
What are the staffing levels at Rolling Green Village?
How many beds does Rolling Green Village have?
Does Rolling Green Village have any deficiencies on record?
Has Rolling Green Village received any fines or penalties?
Who owns Rolling Green Village?
When was Rolling Green Village last inspected?
What quality measures are tracked for Rolling Green Village?
Data Sources
Data source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Ratings, staffing, deficiency, quality measure, and penalty data are from CMS Provider Data. For informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the facility or your state health department.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.