PlainNursing
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

White Oak Estates

Open-data reference.

White Oak Estates is a for profit - corporation facility in Spartanburg, SC with 88 certified beds and a 4-star overall CMS rating. The facility has 12 deficiency records on file. Total penalties: $9K.

400 Webber Road, Spartanburg, SC 29302

Phone: 8645797004

Overall Rating

4/5

Health Inspection

4/5

Staffing

3/5

Quality Measures

3/5

Long-Stay Quality

4/5

Facility Information

Provider Number
425290
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Provider Type
Medicare and Medicaid
Beds
88
Residents
82
In Hospital
No
County
Spartanburg
Last Inspection
Jan 9, 2025

Staffing Data

RN Hours
0.47 (nat'l avg: 0.68)
LPN Hours
1.04
CNA Hours
2.03
Total Nursing Hours
3.54 (nat'l avg: 3.89)
PT Hours
0.06
Nursing Turnover
59.8%
RN Turnover
64.3%

What the CMS Record Reveals About White Oak Estates

White Oak Estates operates 88 certified beds in Spartanburg, SC with approximately 82 residents currently in care, and carries a CMS overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. The overall score is a composite of three weighted sub-ratings published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: health inspection results (4★), staffing levels (3★), and quality measures (3★). Because CMS caps the overall score at the health-inspection tier and then adjusts up or down based on staffing and quality, the sub-scores often tell a sharper story than the headline star count alone — a 3-star facility with weak inspection history reads differently from one held back by thin staffing.

The inspection file contains 12 deficiency records from recent surveys, of which 1 reached the actual-harm or immediate-jeopardy threshold on the CMS scope-and-severity grid. On the enforcement side, CMS has assessed 1 penalty totaling $9K against this provider, a tangible indicator that regulators moved beyond citation into financial consequence. Staffing is reported at 3.54 total nursing hours per resident day (national average 3.89), with RN coverage at 0.47 per resident day — the single staffing metric most strongly tied to resident outcomes in peer-reviewed literature.

Classified as "For profit - Corporation" ownership and operating as a "Medicare and Medicaid" provider, White Oak Estates falls into a category where comparative context matters. National research consistently shows that ownership structure, staffing hours, and turnover are the three operational levers that correlate most strongly with resident outcomes — ratings and fines are lagging indicators of those upstream choices. Reported nursing turnover at this facility is 59.8%, above the level where continuity of care typically begins to suffer. For families evaluating this facility, the CMS record should be read alongside a site visit, direct conversation with current residents and their families, and review of the state health department's most recent inspection report — the star rating is a starting point, not a verdict. All data on this page is sourced from CMS Provider Data and the Nursing Home Compare program; always verify details directly with the facility or your state survey agency before making placement decisions.

Deficiency History (12 most recent)

E — Pattern - Minimal harm Jan 9, 2025 Tag: 0761

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

Category: Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Corrected: Feb 7, 2025

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Jan 9, 2025 Tag: 0689

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Category: Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Corrected: Feb 18, 2025

J — Isolated - Jeopardy Apr 26, 2024 Tag: 0602

Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

Category: Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Corrected: Jan 22, 2024

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0689

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Category: Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0677

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

Category: Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0580

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Category: Resident Rights Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0909

Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.

Category: Environmental Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

F — Widespread - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0812

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

Category: Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 13, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0759

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

Category: Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Mar 15, 2023 Tag: 0758

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

Category: Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Sep 23, 2021 Tag: 0656

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Category: Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Corrected: Oct 22, 2021

D — Isolated - Minimal harm Sep 23, 2021 Tag: 0558

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

Category: Resident Rights Deficiencies

Corrected: Oct 22, 2021

Quality Measures

Measure Type Score Used in Rating
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay 16.1% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight Long Stay 5.4% No
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay 0.7% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay 0.8% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms Long Stay 0.0% No
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained Long Stay 0.0% No
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay 4.1% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine Long Stay 97.4% No
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine Short Stay 89.6% No
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay 0.7% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay 24.0% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication Long Stay 26.0% No
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine Long Stay 100.0% No
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine Short Stay 93.8% No
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay 5.8% Yes
Percentage of long-stay residents with new or worsened bowel or bladder incontinence Long Stay 23.5% No
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay 12.7% Yes

Penalty History 1 penalties totaling $9K

Date Type Amount
Apr 26, 2024 Fine $9K

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the overall CMS rating for White Oak Estates?
White Oak Estates has an overall CMS rating of 4 out of 5 stars. This rating combines health inspection results (4★), staffing levels (3★), and quality measures (3★).
What are the staffing levels at White Oak Estates?
White Oak Estates reports 3.54 total nursing hours per resident day (national average: 3.89). RN hours are 0.47 per resident day (national average: 0.68). Nursing staff turnover is 59.8%.
How many beds does White Oak Estates have?
White Oak Estates has 88 certified beds with approximately 82 residents. The facility is located at 400 Webber Road, Spartanburg, SC 29302.
Does White Oak Estates have any deficiencies on record?
Yes, White Oak Estates has 12 deficiencies on record from recent inspections. Of these, 1 are classified as causing actual harm or jeopardy.
Has White Oak Estates received any fines or penalties?
Yes, White Oak Estates has received 1 penalties totaling $9K.
Who owns White Oak Estates?
White Oak Estates is classified as "For profit - Corporation" ownership. The facility type is "Medicare and Medicaid".
When was White Oak Estates last inspected?
The most recent health inspection for White Oak Estates was on Jan 9, 2025. The facility received a health inspection rating of 4 out of 5 stars.
What quality measures are tracked for White Oak Estates?
White Oak Estates is evaluated on 17 quality measures, of which 8 are used in the CMS star rating calculation. These include measures for both long-stay and short-stay residents covering areas like infections, falls, pressure ulcers, and medication use.

Data Sources

Data source: CMS Nursing Home Compare. Ratings, staffing, deficiency, quality measure, and penalty data are from CMS Provider Data. For informational purposes only. Always verify information directly with the facility or your state health department.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainNursing Editorial